Beady v. Calloway
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFoet, J.
This post-conviction proceeding challenges the validity of petitioner’s plea of guilty to the crime of possession of dangerous drugs and resulting judgment of seven years’ imprisonment. She had no prior record. No appeal was taken therefrom. The post-conviction court, after a hearing, concluded she was denied due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment because the trial judge on his own motion did not hold a hearing regarding her capacity to enter a knowing and voluntary plea when he knew or should have known of a substantial question regarding her competency.① The court entered an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Schick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
- State v. KeysCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Michael Ray Lounsbury v. Frank S. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000