Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Martin v. Siegfried Construction Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 18, 1962Published

1Concurrence

Halpern, J. (dissenting).

I cannot accept the construction of subdivision 4 of section 241 of the Labor Law adopted by the majority of the court. I agree with the construction of that subdivision set forth in Justice Goldman’s concurring opinion, but I do not believe, as he does, that there were prejudicial errors in the court’s charge with respect to the Buies of the Board of Standards and Appeals, and I therefore vote to affirm the judgment appealed from.

So far as the construction of the statute is concerned, it seems plain to me that the construction adopted by Justice Goldman is the only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. Red Hook Cold Storage Co. v. Department of LaborNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Drummond v. Alfred E. Norton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  4. Ithaca Trust Company v. . Driscoll Brothers CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Drummond v. . Alfred E. Norton CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API