Legal Opinion

United States v. Craig

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided October 14, 1983No. SPCM 19687PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

After announcing sentence, the military judge failed to review the sentence limitations specified by the pretrial agreement as required by United States v. Green, 1 M.J. 453 (CMA 1976). We find that the military judge’s failure in this instance does not affect the providence of appellant’s pleas since the providence inquiry reveals that appellant and his counsel had a clear understanding of the terms and effect of the pretrial agreement. Moreover, the limitations imposed by the agreement were mooted by the lenient sentence adjudged. See United States v. Crawford, 11 M.J.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. HintonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  4. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GoodenU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API