Legal Opinion

Nash v. Kirschoff

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 1, 1926No. 25,063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Nibble, J,

Action by the plaintiff, Elizabeth A. Nash, to have it adjudged that the defendant Ledia D. Kirschoff holds in trust for her, as heir of her deceased husband, Fred W. Nash, certain .real property in Minneapolis bought by him and taken in the name of Mrs. Kirschoff. There were findings for the defendants and the plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial.

The case has been here twice. 157 Minn. 418, 196 N. W. 488; 161 Minn. 409, 201 N. W. 617. On the first appeal it was held that the plaintiff did not establish a cause of action; and on the second one that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  2. Smith v. WoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Amundson v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Nash v. KirschoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Werntz v. BolenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of JeruzalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API