Legal Opinion

Amaker v. King County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 25, 2008No. 07-35241Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBINETTE AMAKER,  No. 07-35241 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. CV-05-01470-MJP KING COUNTY, a municipal Western District of corporation; STANLEY MEDICAL Washington, RESEARCH INSTITUTE, a foreign  Seattle corporation; E. FULLER TORREY, ORDER Defendants-Appellees. CERTIFYING QUESTIONS TO THE WASHINGTON  SUPREME COURT Filed August 26, 2008 Before: Richard R. Clifton and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges, and Brian E. Sandoval,* District Judge. COUNSEL Stephen L. Bulzomi (argued), Jeremy A. Johnston, Messina Bulzomi…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re F.D. Processing, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Duffy v. RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Gary Dean Broad Denise Broad, Husband and Wife v. Mannesmann Anlagenbau AgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API