Toledo Scale Co. v. Gogo
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Mecosta; Barton, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by the Toledo Scale Company against John E. Gogo upon a negotiable instrument. From a judgment for defendant there was an appeal to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant upon a verdict directed by the court. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.
This action, which was originally begun in the justice’s court, is brought by the plaintiff against the defendant for the purpose of recovering upon a promissory note. The transaction which gave rise to this controversy occurred on October 4, 1913, when an agent of the plaintiff company called on the defendant and endeavored to sell him a set of scales. After some negotiation the defendant told said agent that he would .take the scales known as “Blue No. 581, equipped with a tare beam/’ and the price was to be $140, and at the same time executed and signed the following writings, which, it is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wait v. PomeroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Choate v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Worden Grocer Co. v. BlandingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- First National Bank v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Cash Register Co. v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Stevens v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Gray v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1917
- In re National Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
- Stevens v. VenemaMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.