Legal Opinion
Adams v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 3, 1993No. 88-0629-CIV-HIGHSMITHPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT
HIGHSMITH, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the court upon Plaintiffs William Adams, Dorothy Adams, Thomas Shelton, and Elizabeth Shelton’s motion for relief from judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Court denies the motion.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Thomas and Elizabeth Shelton (“the Shel-tons”) purchased an automobile insurance policy in their home state of North Carolina from Defendant The Fidelity and Casualty Company of New York (“F & C”). The policy provided for $200,000 in uninsured motorist coverage. In 1982, the Sheltons,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Vick Griffin, D/B/A Griffin Construction Co. v. Swim-Tech Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- McCullough v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hodges v. SnyderSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- L. C. Collins and Lucille Collins, His Wife Earl Schneider and Mildred Schneider, His Wife v. The City of Wichita, Kansas, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.