Legal Opinion

Gornick v. Gillette Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 1985No. C0-85-1233Published

1Opinion of the Court

YETKA, Justice.

A divided Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals panel set aside the compensation judge’s determination that employee had sustained a 10% permanent partial disability of the back and substituted a finding that employee had not proved such disability. Having concluded that the compensation judge’s finding had substantial support in the evidence and that the WCCA did not correctly apply the standard of review required by Minn.Stat. § 176.471 (1984), we reverse and remand for reinstatement of the compensation judge’s decision.

Employee sustained injury to her neck and lower back on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Hosking v. METROPOLITAN HOUSE MOVERS CORPORATIONSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Unger v. Balkan Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API