French v. Harding
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 200, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1910, No. 21, reversing order of C.¡ P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 2748, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Thomas E. French, Ancillary Receiver of The Agnew Company v. J. Horace Harding. Appeal from the Superior Court.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 200, Jan. T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of Superior Court, Oct. T., 1910, No. 21, reversing order of C.¡ P. No. 4, Phila. Co., Dec. T., 1908, No. 2748, making absolute rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in case of Thomas E. French, Ancillary Receiver of The Agnew Company v. J. Horace Harding. Appeal from the Superior Court. Head, J., filed the following opinion: This appeal comes from an order or decree of the learned court below making absolute a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. As, in the view we take of the…
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam,
The majority of the court concur fully in the views expressed by the learned judge of the superior court in his opinion reversing the judgment against the defendant for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, and on that opinion the judgment of the superior court is affirmed.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Feehan v. KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
- Schmitt v. Potter Title & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. CheekCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Bush v. Eastern Uniform Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Rich v. ParkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.