Legal Opinion · Dissent

Harris v. County Commission of Calhoun County

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 2017No. 16-0735Published

1DissentWorkman, J.

I respectfully dissent to the majority opinion; I would have held that the trial court correctly determined that the statute of limitations in the instant case began to run when the employee was damaged at retirement through the receipt of less advantageous retirement benefits than he would have received if he had been timely enrolled.

While the majority opinion accurately recognizes the general rule that a statute of limitations begins to run on a contract claim when the breach occurs, a number of jurisdictions have adopted a much sounder approach, supportive of a modification of that rule…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. State Employees' Ass'n of New Hampshire, Inc. v. Belknap CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Teamsters Local Union 377 v. City of YoungstownOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. General Theraphysical, Inc. v. DupuisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  5. Jiricek v. WOONSOCKET SCHOOL DIST. NO. 55-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API