Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Borlang
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 29, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 14, 1996, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.
Substantial evidence in the record supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant voluntarily left his position as a salesperson for a sporting goods store without good cause. The record establishes that claimant informed the employer that unless his hours and vacation time were renegotiated he would…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of HargroveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re the Claim of CovelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Claim of HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re the Claim of JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- In re the Claim of PoleseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of PoleseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.