Legal Opinion

Beck v. Gulf Production Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 20, 1938No. 3620PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, Justice

(after stating the case,as above).

The claim of the plaintiffs is that the land sued for was not embraced in any of the partition deeds and is unpartitioned land owned by the original tenants in common and the heirs and devisees of such of the original owners as are now dead.

The contention of the defendants is that the land is a part of block No. S.

In brief, the boundary theory of the plaintiffs is that in locating block 5 the course and distance calls in the partition deed to Clinton Beck can alone be considered, and such calls do not embrace the land sued for.

The partition of the land owned…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rio Bravo Oil Co. v. WeedTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gill v. PetersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Rutherford v. TracySupreme Court of Missouri · 1871
  4. Standefer v. VaughanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Mitchner v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duval County Ranch Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  2. Doyle v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
  3. Pocahontas Land Corp. v. EvansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pritchard v. BurnsidesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  5. Tippett v. WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API