Legal Opinion

Ex parte Sandoval

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 14, 2016No. WR-85,569-01PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keller, P.J.,

filed a concurring opinion

in which Keasler and Hervey, JJ., joined.

In Texas, as in the federal system, trial courts are authorized to appoint counsel on habeas in the interests of justice.1 The dissent says that the Court of Criminal Appeals should compel trial courts to appoint counsel whenever there is a “substantial” or even a “colorable” claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. The dissent says this Court has created a broken system and calls on us to enforce the *285plain language in the statute. But what the dissent wants us to do, quite plainly, is to usurp the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Ex parte GarciaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
  4. Ex parte WhisenantCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Brian K. Allison v. State of iowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  3. Ex Parte Damon Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API