Legal Opinion

Bates v. Hogg

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 2, 1996No. 73,255PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*703Gernon, J.:

Plaintiff Dana Bates appeals the trial court’s order prohibiting her from presenting evidence on the full value of her medical expenses and limiting the evidence at trial to the actual amounts paid. Bates also appeals the court’s ruling limiting the testimony of one of her expert witnesses and the court’s order eliminating the jury award for noneconomic damages.

Defendant Clinton Hogg and Bates were involved in an injury accident in January 1992. Hogg’s pickup truck, traveling at approximately 40 miles per hour, struck Bates’ vehicle from behind.

Prior to trial, Hogg filed a motion…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  3. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Memorial Hospital Ass'n, Inc. v. KnutsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Millard Processing Services, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Moorhead v. Crozer Chester Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Bynum v. MagnoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Papke v. HarbertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Haselden v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Rose v. via Christi Health System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API