Legal Opinion

David Berg & Co. v. Ravkind

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1964No. 16PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.

This is a suit upon a demand promissory note. David Berg and Company, as plaintiff, brought suit against David Ravkind, Shirley Ravkind, and Max Blasser upon a demand promissory note dated July 25, 1960, in the original principal sum of $17,000.00. Plaintiff sought judgment against the defendants, jointly and severally, for the full amount of such note, interest from July 13, 1961, and attorney’s fees as provided by said note. Trial upon the merits before a jury and upon special issues resulted in a verdict that payments totalling $11,450.00 had been made by defendants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hubacek v. Ennis State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Reed v. ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Dooley v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Fain v. Texas-Hanover Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Edens v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. Preston State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
  2. Hogg v. JaeckleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Apodaca v. NewRez LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023
  4. Cromeens v. Arnold Cotton Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. SW Loan A, L.P. v. Anibal J. Duarte-Viera, Antonio P. Pardo and Edward M. Reiss, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API