Capers v. the Bon Marche
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.
— Delores Capers sued The Bon Marche (the Bon) for wrongfully terminating her on the basis of race. The court’s jury instructions properly stated that Mrs. Capers need show by only a preponderance of the evidence that race was a substantial factor in her termination decision. But the special verdict form did not include the “substantial factor” language; it asked the jury to decide whether The Bon Marche terminated Mrs. Capers “because of’ her race. The jury returned a verdict in The Bon’s favor. Mrs. Capers appeals, claiming the instructions were legally erroneous, conflicted, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- MacKay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- MacSuga v. County of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Boeing Co. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.