Legal Opinion

Capers v. the Bon Marche

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 18, 1998No. 39717-6-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

— Delores Capers sued The Bon Marche (the Bon) for wrongfully terminating her on the basis of race. The court’s jury instructions properly stated that Mrs. Capers need show by only a preponderance of the evidence that race was a substantial factor in her termination decision. But the special verdict form did not include the “substantial factor” language; it asked the jury to decide whether The Bon Marche terminated Mrs. Capers “because of’ her race. The jury returned a verdict in The Bon’s favor. Mrs. Capers appeals, claiming the instructions were legally erroneous, conflicted, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. WanrowWashington Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Adcox v. Children's Orthopedic Hospital & Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. MacKay v. Acorn Custom Cabinetry, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ingram v. EarthmanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  2. City of Bellevue v. RaumCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. MacSuga v. County of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. Sharbono v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Boeing Co. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API