Striegel v. Hillcrest Heights Development Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Rose H. Sconiers, J.
*699Plaintiff, Robert Striegel, by notice of motion seeks partial summary judgment imposing liability against defendant and third-party plaintiff, Hillcrest Heights Development Corporation (Hillcrest), under Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) and reserving for trial the issues of plaintiff’s damages. Hillcrest as the owner and general contractor of a certain construction project of residential housing, including 35 North Hill Drive, East Aurora, New York, resists this motion and cross-moves for summary judgment seeking indemnification and costs from…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Damon v. StarkweatherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- White v. Sperry Supply & Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Manning v. Town of LewistonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993