Legal Opinion

Manning v. Town of Lewiston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 12, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed wdthout costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiff was injured while working on the roof of a water holding tank *1036approximately 35 feet above the ground. The roof was flat for the first three feet from the edge and then sloped upward about 10 more feet. A railing around the edge of the tank had been removed a few weeks before and no other safety devices were present. Plaintiff tripped on a discarded piece of scaffolding and fell onto the flat part of the roof, landing on the pipe scaffolding he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pietsch v. Moog, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Brown v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Aruck v. Xerox Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Aruck v. Xerox Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. White v. Sperry Supply & Warehouse, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Smith v. Artco Industrial Laundries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Striegel v. Hillcrest Heights Development Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API