Rando v. Impresa Navigazione Commercialle, S. A.

Frank E. Johnson, Off. Bef.

Testimony has been taken under the order to determine if the defendant corporation was duly served; a summons was delivered to this person who testified, but whether service was thus duly obtained on defendant is the question here. No testimony was offered here by plaintiff to contradict that witness; he was examined by defendant’s counsel when plaintiff did not appear on the day the hearing was duly set before the undersigned; no motion to open that ex parte hearing has been made. Upon his testimony the com*577pany has not been doing business here, and by service on…