Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kenai Peninsula Borough v. English Bay Village Corp.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1989No. S-2033Published

1DissentMoore, Justice

The court concludes that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Kenai Borough’s motion to set aside the default judgment. I would vacate the entry of default judgment under either of two alternative grounds and remand the case for trial.

The majority opinion’s factual recitation from the record is incomplete. So that the reader is able to fully understand and fairly evaluate my reasons for dissenting, I must set forth additional facts which, in my opinion, require a reversal of the trial court’s entry of a default judgment.

I

In the late 1970s, English Bay entered into a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Steve Benny v. Danny Pipes and Charles PayneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Walter L. Compton, Jr. v. Alton Steamship Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  3. Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  4. Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Winfield Associates, Inc. v. W. L. StonecipherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API