Legal Opinion

Piquette v. Stevens

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 28, 1999No. 5066, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WENNER, Judge.

The genesis of this appeal is a judgment entered by the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County in favor of appel-lee/cross-appellant, Seth Herman Stevens (Stevens). Appellant/cross-appellee is Frederick W. Piquette (Piquette). On appeal, Piquette presents us with the following questions, which we have rephrased for clarity: 1

I. As a matter of law, does a bicyclist who fails to come to a complete stop at a stop sign while attempting to make a right turn onto the boulevard, assume the risk of being struck by a vehicle making a left turn off of the boulevard?

II. Is it an abuse of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Morris v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
  4. Buck v. Cam's Broadloom Rugs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. Schroyer v. McNealCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern Management Corp. v. TahaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Kaminsky v. SebileCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API