State v. Garner
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction of two counts of aggravated murder. ORS 163.095(l)(e), (2)(e). Defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal that challenged the sufficiency of the evidence with respect to both aggravating factors. We review the court’s ruling for errors of law, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found the aggravating factors proved beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. King, 307 Or 332, 339, 768 P2d 391 (1989). We affirm defendant’s conviction…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. MontezOregon Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. LinkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Garner v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017