Legal Opinion
Eustace v. Springfield Public Schools
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 29, 2020No. 3:17-cv-30158Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS MARY JANE EUSTACE, RUTH CHAPPEL, CONSTANCE RODD, and DERYL BLANKS, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-30158-MGM v. SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendants. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dkt. Nos. 32, 37, 42, 47, 52) May 29, 2020 MASTROIANNI, U.S.D.J. Plaintiffs Mary Jane Eustace, Ruth Chappel, Constance Rodd, and Deryl Blanks (“Plaintiffs” or “Plaintiff”) allege that Defendant Springfield Public Schools (“SPS,” “the district,” or “Defendant”) violated the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- US Airways, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Calero-Cerezo v. U.S. Dep of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.