Smith v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Lamont Smith v. State of Maryland No. 573, Sept. Term 2022 Opinion by Leahy, J. Preservation > Confrontation Clause and Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) Though the Confrontation Clause and Rule 5-804(b)(3) are interrelated, “it is well-settled that the two grounds are not synonymous or coextensive; thus objecting on one ground does not preserve the other ground.” Collins v. State,
164 Md. App. 582, 605-06
(2005). Evidence > Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) > Statement Against Interest > Corroborating Circumstances > Trustworthiness Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) instructs that a statement “tending to expose the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.