Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 26, 2023No. 0573/22Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lamont Smith v. State of Maryland No. 573, Sept. Term 2022 Opinion by Leahy, J. Preservation > Confrontation Clause and Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) Though the Confrontation Clause and Rule 5-804(b)(3) are interrelated, “it is well-settled that the two grounds are not synonymous or coextensive; thus objecting on one ground does not preserve the other ground.” Collins v. State,

164 Md. App. 582, 605-06

(2005). Evidence > Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) > Statement Against Interest > Corroborating Circumstances > Trustworthiness Maryland Rule 5-804(b)(3) instructs that a statement “tending to expose the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API