Legal Opinion

Clark v. Bauer

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 6, 1933No. Docket No. 4860PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Judgment went for the defendant in this action, from which judgment and the denial of a motion for a new trial the plaintiffs appeal. As no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for new trial, that portion of the appeal may stand dismissed without further consideration.

This action was prosecuted by the plaintiffs in the trial court to secure a judgment against the defendant for and on account of damages to a certain hay crop belonging to the plaintiffs, having been caused by the negligence and wrongful acts of the defendant; and also, exemplary damages are prayed for upon the ground that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Price v. Sixth District Agricultural Assn.California Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Elswick v. MatneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Francis v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Evans v. HortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API