Legal Opinion

Hausse v. Kimmey

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1994No. S-93-319PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

John C. Hoagland appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial. Hoagland sought a new trial on his cross-claim against his codefendants Kristopher T. Kimmey, a minor, and Kimmey’s parents, Edward D. and Barbara S. Kimmey, in a negligence action initiated by Les M. and Holly L. Hausse.

When reviewing a question of law, an appellate court reaches a conclusion independent of the trial court’s rulings. Stack v. Sobczak, 243 Neb. 78, 497 N.W.2d 374 (1993).

Hoagland assigns as error that the district court (1) failed to sustain his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Palmtag v. Gartner Construction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Nickal v. PhinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Burney v. EhlersNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Kafka v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Law v. GilmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Law Offices of Ronald J. Palagi, P.C. v. DolanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Edward E. v. ClaytonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lee Sapp Leasing, Inc. v. Catholic Archbishop of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Dolan v. SvitakNebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API