Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. United States

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 5, 1956No. Civ. A. 9833PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN L. MILLER, District Judge.

This is a proceeding brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346, 2671-2680. The plaintiff’s decedent was fatally electrocuted on August 30, 1949, while employed by the third-party defendant, then engaged in the performance of a contract with the United States to place the Keystone Ordnance Works near Geneva, Pennsylvania, in a stand-by condition. The complaint of the plaintiff administrator sets forth causes of action under the Pennsylvania Wrongful Death and Survival'statutes. 12 P.S. §§ 1601-1604; 20 P.S. § 320.601 et seq.

Findings of Fact

1.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. MacDougall v. Penna. Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Valles v. Peoples-Pittsburgh Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Engle v. ReiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Cooper v. Heintz Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McGarry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1973
  2. Dunnaway v. Duquesne Light Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  3. Medley v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1979
  4. Joe Ernest Dunnaway, Adm. Of the Estate of Joseph McKnight Dec'd v. Duquesne Light Co., a Penna. Corp. v. Allegheny Contracting Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API