Legal Opinion

Geier v. Geier

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 2013No. 26389PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Janet Geier appeals from the trial court’s denial of her motion to set aside a judgment. We reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

[¶ 2.] Janet and James Geier were married on February 15, 1997. At the time of the hearing, James was 61 and Janet was 54. During their marriage, Janet and James worked at a hospital in Mil-bank, South Dakota, as registered nurses. They did not have any children together.

[¶ 3.] Janet was diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in 1992. James was aware of Janet’s diagnosis at the time of their marriage. She also has a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Surety Corporation v. ShoemakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Sjomeling v. StuberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Walsh v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Action Carrier, Inc. v. United National Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rabo Agrifinance, Inc. v. Rock Creek Farms, FinnemansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Estate of MackSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API