Legal Opinion

People v. Cihlar

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 18, 1982No. 80-2374PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Defendant was found guilty by a jury of rape, burglary and home invasion and not guilty of armed robbery. He was sentenced to a 6-year term. He raises as issues for review whether: (1) he was proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) he was prejudiced by the State’s failure to provide his attorney with a statement of a State’s witness; (3) the court erred in allowing into evidence inadmissible hearsay testimony; and (4) the court erred in refusing to give an instruction as to prior inconsistent statements.

The victim testified that on June 24,1979, she returned to her Lyons, Illinois,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. The People v. DamenIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. DaliegeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  5. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CihlarIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. ThomasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. MillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. People v. CihlarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  5. People v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API