Legal Opinion
Davis v. Town of Hempstead
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 24, 2006No. 04-0870PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED in part and VACATED and REMANDED in part.
Plaintiff Martin Davis brought this action pro se alleging that his constitutional rights had been violated when agents of the Town of Hempstead (the “Town”) entered his property pursuant to a resolution of the Town Board in order to remove structures that the Town had deemed unsafe. The District Court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment, and plaintiff brought this appeal. We assume *237the parties’ familiarity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Patterson v. County of OneidaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Joan Gronowski v. John D. Spencer, Mayor of the City of Yonkers, Sued in His Individual Capacity, and City of Yonkers, Docket No. 04-2605-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holly Jarvis v. Citizen Review Board of the City of SyracuseDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026
- Louisiana Management Co., LLC v. City of Saratoga Springs, New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025