Legal Opinion
In re Taitano
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 5, 2017No. A147412Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 7/5/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE A147412 In re JORDAN E. TAITANO on Habeas Corpus. (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 5-132337-7) Jordan E. Taitano was determined by the trial court to be incompetent to stand trial. His commitment facility subsequently found there was no substantial likelihood he would be restored to mental competence in the foreseeable future, he completed the three-year maximum commitment period, and he was determined not to be subject to a conservatorship as gravely disabled.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.