Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jacobsen v. Allstate Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2013No. DA 12-0130Published

1DissentJustice Baker

¶93 I agree that the District Court erred in certifying class-wide punitive damages relief under M. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2). The Court’s attempt to preserve the class certification order is flawed, however, because it still leaves in place a class claim that cannot meet the requirements of Rule 23(b)(2).

¶94 As a preliminary matter, regarding Rule 23(a), I disagree with the Court’s statement that Wal-Mart has raised “dual questions” that require some future case for our clarification. Opinion, ¶¶ 32-33. First, no party in this case has disputed that Wal-Mart’s analysis of the commonality element…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jamie S. v. Milwaukee Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Bolin v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  3. Essex Insurance v. Moose's Saloon, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cholakyan v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2012
  5. Bragg v. McLaughlinMontana Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API