Legal Opinion

People v. Mejia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 2004PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Resnik, J.), imposed May 23, 2001, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Since the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive the sentence which was thereafter actually imposed, he has no basis to now complain that his sentence was excessive (see People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 [1984]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, H. Miller, Schmidt and Cozier, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. KazepisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. GriggAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. People v. KulmatycskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. RojasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. VereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API