Legal Opinion

Association of Commercial Property Owners v. New York City Loft Board

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1985PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Myriam J. Altman, J.

In this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 petitioners seek to annul a regulation adopted by the New York City Loft Board (Loft Board) which mandates the same minimum heating standards for interim multiple dwellings (IMDs) as are required for other residential units in New York City. Petitioners claim the regulation is arbitrary, capricious and unconstitutional because it does not include a cost pass-along for increased fuel *371expenses. For the reasons stated below, the proceeding is dismissed.

The Loft Law (Multiple Dwelling Law § 280 et seq.) was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc. v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Bernstein v. ToiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Lincoln Building Associates v. BarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 126 Front Street Realty Co. v. New York City Loft BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Korn v. BatistaNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API