Legal Opinion
Hill Realty Co. v. Peck, No. 542862 (Aug. 16, 1999)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided August 16, 1999No. 542862Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (#119) AND MOTION FOR SUMMARY IUDGMENT (#121)
The plaintiff, Steven Woods, filed a complaint in this court which (when fairly read in an accommodating fashion afforded pro se litigants) seeks money damages on the basis that the defendant, Attorney Peck, allegedly "overcharged" him in the course of a foreclosure action against the plaintiff. It is undisputed that the defendant was engaged as an attorney on behalf of Connecticut National Bank for the purpose of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Krawczyk v. StingleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Serrano v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Vasel v. Vasel, No. Cv 950556058 (Sep. 17, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996