Legal Opinion

Foamite-Childs Corp. v. Pyrene Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided October 6, 1927No. 544Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

Claims 1, 3 and 6 of patent No. 858,188, to Laurent, for a hand fire-extinguishing apparatus, now owned by the plaintiff, Foamite-Childs Corporation, are here in issue. The defendant, Pyrene Manufacturing Company, is charged with infringing these claims. The chief defense is noninfringement, the soundness of which turns upon the scope of the claims to be arrived at by interpretation.

The first claim calls for “a fire-extinguishing apparatus, comprising a receptacle containing separated gas-producing fire-extinguishing substances and a foam-producing substance, which…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyden Power-Brake Co. v. Westinghouse Westinghouse v. Boyden Power-Brake Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Corning v. BurdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  3. Fuller v. YentzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Diamond Match Co. v. Ruby Match Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1904
  5. American Crayon Co. v. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API