Legal Opinion

Application of Arthur L. Maloy, Charles R. Maloney and James O. Hambrick

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 12, 1964No. Patent Appeal 7137PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMOND, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals refusing claims in patent application Serial No. 622,837, filed November 19, 1956, for “Production of Styrene from Phenyl Methyl Carbinol.”

The invention relates to a method of producing styrene. The prior art taught the dehydration of phenyl methyl carbinol with the aid of a catalyst to form styrene. The claimed invention here appealed is “the discovery that phenyl methyl carbinol can be dehydrated to styrene with sulfuric acid as the catalyst in the vapor phase.”

Claim 1 is illustrative and reads as follows:

“Process for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Application of Vannevar BushCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  2. In re CowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Application of Benjamin J. Chromy and Philip H. AllenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Application of Norman A. MeinhardtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  2. Chesebrough-Pond's Inc. v. Faberge, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API