Sadat v. American Motors Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos
Plaintiff Roxanne Sadat appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint for a mandatory injunction. The complaint sought an order which would have compelled defendant American Motors Corporation to comply with the terms of a warranty which it extended to plaintiff in connection with her purchase of a new American Motors car. Plaintiff’s sole contention on appeal is that the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (the Act) (15 U.S.C. sec. 2301 et seq. (1976)) authorizes consumers to maintain an action for an injunction to enforce the terms of a warranty without requiring them to plead or prove…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- People v. KeevenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- The People Ex Rel. Carpentier v. GoersIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- City of Highland Park v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cosman v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Sadat v. American Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Hartigan v. StianosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
- Mydlach v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Nowalski v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.