Legal Opinion

Winget v. Gay

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.

This is a statutory action to ascertain, determine and quiet title to a tract of land lying in Shelby County, Missouri. It was brought by the heirs of Sarah R. Arthur, deceased, against the heirs of Charles W. Gay, deceased. Gay is the common source of title. The devolution of the title from him was effected through his will, the proper construction of the 9th item of which is determinative of this controversy.

Charles W. Gay married a widow, Catherine Arthur, who had three small children, the oldest of which was about four years of age. The'youngest was Sarah R. Arthur. Two children were born…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. GarescheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  2. Harlow v. BaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  3. Knost v. KnostSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
  4. Maddox v. YoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Ruggles v. JewettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co. v. BinowitzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Hereford v. UNKNOWN HEIRS, ETC.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Buschmeyer v. EikermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  4. Byrd v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Hereford v. Unknown Heirs, Grantees or Successors of TholozanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API