Hyland v. Rochelle
Indiana Supreme Court
From Marion Circuit Court (20,337); Charles Remster Judge. Application for a writ of habeas corpus by Louis Rochelle against Martin J. Hyland and others. Prom a judgment for the applicant, the defendants appeal.
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion.
Cox, J.
Ordinarily the futility of a dissenting opinion is so apparent that I am sometimes led to refrain from dissent even though my mind fails to give free and unhampered concurrence in all respects to the prevailing opinion. In the case before us, however, I am so sensibly impressed with a conviction that the court has fallen into error that I am constrained to give some reasons for the conclusion entertained by me that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed.
Appellee was in custody as a fugitive from justice by due and orderly procedure up to and including the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Strassheim v. DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Prigg v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.