Legal Opinion

Verstandig & Sons, Inc. v. Sobel

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

Involved here is a transaction, common in the jewelry trade, by which the plaintiff delivered to the defendant, a broker, certain diamonds on memorandum. They were either lost or stolen while in the defendant’s possession. The plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $34,798.50, as the agreed value of the merchandise. In the first cause of action, the plaintiff sues upon a common-law bailment, and, in a second cause of action, the plaintiff sues on the written memorandum.

The plaintiff moves, in pursuance of rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for summary judgment on the second count. In its…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
  2. General Phoenix Corp. v. CabotNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Ryan v. . WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Laskey v. Rubel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1951
  5. Komp v. . RaymondNew York Court of Appeals · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Proteus Books Limited, Cross-Appellee v. Cherry Lane Music Company, Incorporated, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. Mitler v. FriedebergNew York Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Lipschutz v. Gordon Jewelry CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1974
  4. Rodman v. N & a Goldman Co. (In Re W. T. Grant Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
  5. Wachtel v. Rich (In Re Rich)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API