Legal Opinion

Mistich v. Holman

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 7, 1944No. 37339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PONDER, Justice.

Mrs. Dorothy Holman Mistich, defendant appellee, seeks to dismiss the appeal in this case. It appears that the testimony-presented in the lower court was not taken down in writing, and that the transcript of the appeal contains no note of evidence, no statement of facts, no assignment of errors and no bills of exception. The transcript contains merely the pleadings in the case. The judgment appealed from was rendered in a suit for separation from bed and board wherein the defendant reconvened. The determination of the suit depended entirely upon the testimony and veracity of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. New Orleans Silica Brick Co. v. John Thatcher & SonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Harnischfeger Sales Corporation v. Sternberg Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Portier v. Marquette Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  2. Gauthier v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Williams v. Credit Service CorporationLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Succession of La Pene v. LagraizeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  5. Townsend v. GrahamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API