Legal Opinion
City of Bloomington v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 19, 1987No. 85-2881PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFEY, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff-appellant Indiana Public Interest Research Group (“InPIRG”) appeals the district court’s denial of its motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 in a consolidated suit brought by the United States, the State of Indiana, and the City of Bloomington, Indiana, against Westinghouse Electric Corporation. We affirm.
I
In 1981, the City of Bloomington, Indiana, filed suit against the Westinghouse Electric Corporation (“Westinghouse”), alleging that Westinghouse had contaminated the city’s sewer system and its Winston-Thomas sewage treatment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United Airlines, Inc. v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- 17 Fair empl.prac.cas. 528, 14 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 7813 Eddie Stallworth v. Monsanto Company v. J. W. Palmer, Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- McDonald v. E. J. Lavino Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Culbreath v. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lopez-Aguilar v. Marion Cnty. Sheriff's Dep'tCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Ragsdale v. TurnockCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Stewart v. RubinDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1996
- State of Illinois v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- N.J. Dep't of Envtl. Prot. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.