Legal Opinion

Kirby Center of Spring Hill v. State, Department of Labor & Employment Security, Division of Unemployment Compensation

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 16, 1995No. 94-1035PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAHN, Judge.

Appellant Kirby Center of Spring Hill appeals from an order of the Department of Labor & Employment Security, Division of Unemployment Compensation [Division]. The order finds that Kirby’s telephone solicitors must be classified as employees for unemployment compensation purposes. Kirby contends that the telephone solicitors are direct sellers under section 443.036(19)(n)21, Florida Statutes (1990), which defines “direct seller” as a person:

a. (I) Who is engaged in the trade or business of selling or soliciting the sale of consumer products to buyers on a buy-sell basis or a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES REL. v. Dade County PoliceSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Vocelle v. Knight Brothers Paper CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Brand v. Florida Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Cleveland Institute of Electronics, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1992
  5. Nickols v. Division of RetirementDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacK v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. International Ass'n of Machinists v. TuckerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API