Legal Opinion
In re Exstein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 4, 1942PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
Petitioner has applied under Rule 27 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, for an order directing the perpetuation of testimony of certain specified individuals and corporations, against all or some of whom he later intends to bring an action.
*243Petitioner agreed to purchase a quantity of steel rails. The written memorandum of sale is on the stationery of Dulien Steel Products, Inc., a Washington corporation. He claims that a breach of contract has occurred, and desires to institute suit but asserts that he is confronted with the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In re ErnstDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Egan v. Moran Towing & Transportation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
3Cited by11 opinions
- Evans v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
- In re North CarolinaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Powers v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New EnglandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Allen v. AllenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- In re the Petition of Gary Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.