Shanley v. Hurley
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, a motion was made by defendant for a directed verdict, assigning several grounds therefor. The motion was granted, the court stating specifically, as the reason for so doing, that it was an essential element of the plaintiff’s ease to show that the mare and colt were killed without any negligence on the part of the railroad company, without which showing there was no question for the jury. On exception to this ruling, the case is here.
The tendency of the evidence, stated most strongly in favor of the plaintiff, was, that the plaintiff and the defendant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. CalhounSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Cross v. Passumpsic Fibre Leather Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1916
- Morrisette v. Canadian Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1902
- Isham v. Estate of DowSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Woodcock's Admr. v. HallockSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Jernigan v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- McConnell v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- State v. Ty Baker, Sr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.