Legal Opinion

Shepard v. Wo Hop City, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 10, 2019No. 1:18-cv-09634Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHIRLEY SHEPARD and ANDREA SHEPARD, Plaintiffs, 18-CV-9634 (JPO) -v- OPINION AND ORDER WO HOP CITY, INC., Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: Plaintiffs Shirley Shepard and Andrea Shepard (“the Shepards”) bring this copyright infringement action against Defendant Wo Hop City, Inc. (“Wo Hop”) under the Copyright Act,

17 U.S.C. § 101

et seq. (Dkt. No. 16.) Wo Hop moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6) to dismiss the operative complaint for failure to state a claim. (Dkt. Nos. 13, 17.) For the reasons that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Staehr v. Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. Kailash C. Pani, M.D., and Kailash C. Pani, M.D., P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API