Carrow v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Movant appeals denial of post conviction relief under Rule 27.26. Findings of fact, conclusions of law and judgment denying relief were rendered without an evidentiary hearing. He appeals claiming (1) ineffective assistance of counsel, (2) defects in the presentation of charges which rendered guilty pleas involuntary, (3) consecutive sentences on four charges were not made concurrent to a prior sentence received in another county as apparently intended by the sentencing court, and, (4) credit for jail time allowed by the sentencing court has not been properly computed.
P…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Laws v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Baker v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Oerly v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Shepherd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Grove v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- Maulhardt v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
- White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Carrow v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.