Legal Opinion
Oneida Indian Nation of Wisconsin, Oneida of the Thames Band, the Houdenosaunee, Applicants-Intervenors-Appellants v. State of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 5, 1984No. 893, Docket 83-7910Published
1Opinion of the Court
732 F.2d 261
76 A.L.R.Fed. 377
ONEIDA INDIAN NATION OF WISCONSIN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Oneida of the Thames Band, Plaintiff-Appellee,
The Houdenosaunee, et al., Applicants-Intervenors-Appellants,
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 893, Docket 83-7910.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Feb. 22, 1984.
Decided April 5, 1984.
1
Robert T. Coulter, Washington, D.C. for applicants-intervenors-appellants, The Houdenosaunee and certain constituent nations.
2
Richard Dauphinais, Washington, D.C. (Arlinda Locklear, Native American Rights Fund, Washington, D.C., Francis…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. FornessCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States Postal Service v. BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- The New York IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Banco Nacional De Cuba, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Chase Manhattan Bank, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.