Legal Opinion
In Re Adrienne S. Wolf and Gertrude R. Shenk
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 22, 1988No. 88-7045PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Petitioners, Adrienne Wolf and Gertrude Shenk, filed a complaint in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia against four defendants 1 including the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority ("WMATA”). WMATA immediately removed the action to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and then answered the complaint. No parties other than petitioners and WMATA entered an appearance in the action.
On January 21, 1988, petitioners and WMATA filed a praecipe stipulating to a voluntary dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Szabo Food Service, Inc. v. Canteen CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Will v. Calvert Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gardiner v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by28 opinions
- Anago Franchising, Inc. v. SHAZ, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- Yesh Music v. Lakewood ChurchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Kathleen Smith and Gladys Smith, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Floyd Wayne Smith, Deceased v. The Honorable Layn R. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Hester Industries, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Tyson Foods, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Harrington v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.